Fullerton is considering a significant shift in its governance structure by potentially transitioning from a general law city to a charter city. This change, discussed at a recent city council meeting on Tuesday (March 4), would grant the city more flexibility in local governance, including how taxes are levied and public contracts are bid for. Currently, Fullerton operates under general law, which requires adherence to state regulations and limits local autonomy.
A charter city, on the other hand, can establish its own regulations on municipal matters, provided they don't conflict with the state constitution. This could allow Fullerton to adopt a "strong mayor" system, similar to San Diego. However, the process of becoming a charter city involves drafting a charter, selecting a committee, and ultimately, a public vote.
During the council meeting, many residents voiced their opinions. Misty Omar, a long-time resident, expressed concerns about losing state law protections and the potential for special interests to gain power. Similarly, Todd Harrison questioned the transparency and urgency of the proposal, suggesting that resources could be better allocated to pressing city issues.
Proponents like Josh Ferguson argue that studying the charter city option is inherently democratic, as it allows residents to participate in shaping their city's governance. The council must decide whether to pursue this transition, which would require a majority vote in a general election.
The debate continues, with the council weighing the potential benefits of increased local control against concerns about transparency and the costs involved in the transition. The decision will ultimately rest with Fullerton's voters, who will have the final say in a future election.